AECManagementSolutions.com
Dedicated to helping architects and engineers earn the profits they deserve
Home | Subscribe to Newsletter | Seminars and Services | Contact Us | Seminars | Tell a Friend | Text Size | Search | Member Area
Receive our Free Newsletter



 Join Us
Gain immediate access to all our Feature Articles, Downloads and Top 10 Lists, Click here to become a member!
 About this Site
 Who We Are
 Our People
 DEPARTMENTS
 Newsletter
 Seminars and Services
 Top 10 List
 Feature Articles
 Technology Tips
 Download Library
 Events
 Most Popular
 Testimonials
 Video Top 10 Lists
 PRODUCTS
 Webinars on CD
 Seminars
 Videos & Workbooks
 RESOURCES
 Subscribe to Newsletter
 Article Index
 Contact Us
 Help
 Industry Resources
 Tell a Friend
 Text Size
 Your Account
 Other
 Article Reprints
 Our Guarantee
 Privacy Policy
 Site Map
 Terms of Use


home | Feature Articles | Who Took The Incentive Out of Incent . . .
 

Who Took The Incentive Out of Incentive Compensation?
Herb Cannon
Printer-Friendly Format

Over the last 20 years, I have had the opportunity to review dozens of incentive compensation plans and suggest improvements. Unfortunately, most of the plans I have reviewed fall far short of what is required to create a real incentive. One of the biggest mistakes you can make in devising an Incentive Compensation plan is to reward the wrong behavior.

Many plans reward things like:

  • The number of hours worked
  • How long the employee has been with the company
  • The perceived value an employee contributed during the year

    While all of these things are nice, incentive compensation is not the mechanism to reward them. Do I really care if someone works a lot of hours? No. They might be a particularly slow worker who needs the time to accomplish what others can in a normal work day. Why should they be rewarded through incentive compensation?

    start quoteOne of the biggest mistakes in devising an incentive compensation plan is to reward the wrong behavior.end quote
    -- Herb Cannon

    Should someone get more of an incentive payment just because they have been here forever? No. Think of the negative impact on someone who has been here a shorter amount of time, but contributes twice as much profit to the firm. Why should they care about profit when it isn't rewarded?

    Should someone be rewarded by the perceived value of their contribution? No. Perception is in the eye of the perceiver. It will be viewed by the staff as too arbitrary and a moving target. When someone is put in the position of making this judgment, they tend to fall back to the politically correct decision. They reward things like how much they like this person, their seniority or how much they need the money.

    This does not mean that people should not be rewarded for all of these things - just don't do it in your incentive compensation plan.

    Successful plans are structured to:

  • Reward economic contribution to the company
  • Recognize that non-economic contributions get non-economic rewards
  • Provide substantial and frequent reinforcement of desired

    Incentive compensative is design to reward those employees who exceed the minimum profit expectations. Employees, who only meet the minimum expectations, are already being compensated with a base salary. They do not get an incentive compensation payment. When they see others in the company getting incentive payments, they have an incentive to do better next time.

    Non-economic contributions to the company are not rewarded in the incentive compensation plan. Examples of non-economic contributions are winning awards and organizing the library. Reward these outside of the incentive compensation plan.

    Do not limit the reward. Why would anyone want to provide a disincentive? If the employees are making a great deal of money let them keep going. I am more than happy to share.

    The optimum frequency of incentive payments is quarterly. There needs to be a immediate cause and effect to reinforce profitable behavior. If the payment is annual, employees won't worry about profit until sometime between Labor Day and Halloween.

    I realize that this subject is a lot more complicated than this short article. Future issues will go into greater detail. The bottom line is that if someone makes a lot of money for the company, they deserve to be rewarded. The more money an employee makes for the company, the more they should be rewarded.

    If you have an Incentive Compensation plan at your company and would like to share your ideas, please send me an e-mail




    Want to Reprint This Article?




    ·  Incentive Compensation Services
    ·  Incentive Compensation Follow-up